Polls voted
Points earned
Polls yet to vote
by truepoll 12 days ago, Politics & Gov

Should the monarchy be abolished in the United Kingdom?

The monarchy in the United Kingdom remains a significant institution, steeped in history and tradition. While it sparks debate about its relevance in the modern era, it also carries undeniable advantages and challenges. Here's an overview of the monarchy's role and its implications:

Sources of Income :: The monarchy primarily receives funds from the Sovereign Grant, which is derived from a percentage of profits from the Crown Estate, a vast portfolio of land and property owned by the monarchy. Notably, the Crown Estate profits exceed the funds allocated to the monarchy, with the surplus returned to the UK Treasury. Additionally, members of the royal family generate private income from their estates, like the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster.

Tourism and Economic Impact :: The monarchy is a major driver of tourism in the UK. Landmarks like Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, and royal events draw millions of visitors annually. It's estimated that the royal family contributes billions of pounds to the UK economy each year through tourism and associated industries.

No Burden on Taxpayers :: While some public funds support the monarchy, their financial self-sustainability offsets these costs. The royal family’s activities are largely funded by their private estates and income, making them a net contributor to the state’s finances.

Political Neutrality :: The monarchy is constitutionally barred from engaging in politics, ensuring a stable and impartial role. They act as a unifying figurehead without influencing elections or policy decisions.

Tradition and Heritage :: Many view the monarchy as an emblem of British identity and continuity, preserving centuries-old traditions. For supporters, the institution represents a valuable cultural and historical asset.

Criticism and Calls for Abolition :: Critics argue that the monarchy perpetuates outdated notions of hierarchy, viewing citizens as inferior to the royals. They call for abolition as a step toward a more egalitarian society. Some believe that, despite their neutrality, the institution inherently embodies privilege and inequality.

ALL

INDIA

MORE
X
  • East Midlands
  • East of England
  • London
  • North East
  • North West
  • Northern Ireland
  • Scotland
  • South East
  • South West
  • Wales
  • West Midlands
  • Yorkshire and the Humber
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
Advertisement
Male
0.0%
0
Female
0.0%
0

No, because they are a valuable tradition, contribute to the economy through tourism, are self-funded and sustainable, and do not interfere in politics.

0
0

I have no problem with them, as long as they are not a burden on taxpayers and do not interfere in politics or policy.

0
0

Yes, because the monarchy perpetuates inequality, embodies outdated notions of hierarchy, and views citizens as inferior.

0
0

I don’t care about this issue.

0
0
Advertisement

Age Group

Gen Z 0-24 Yrs
( 0% - 0 voters )
0%
No, because they are a valuable tradition, contribute to the economy through tourism, are self-funded and sustainable, and do not interfere in politics.
0%
I have no problem with them, as long as they are not a burden on taxpayers and do not interfere in politics or policy.
0%
Yes, because the monarchy perpetuates inequality, embodies outdated notions of hierarchy, and views citizens as inferior.
0%
I don’t care about this issue.
E Millennials 25-34 Yrs
( 0% - 0 voters )
0%
No, because they are a valuable tradition, contribute to the economy through tourism, are self-funded and sustainable, and do not interfere in politics.
0%
I have no problem with them, as long as they are not a burden on taxpayers and do not interfere in politics or policy.
0%
Yes, because the monarchy perpetuates inequality, embodies outdated notions of hierarchy, and views citizens as inferior.
0%
I don’t care about this issue.
L Millennials 35-44 Yrs
( 0% - 0 voters )
0%
No, because they are a valuable tradition, contribute to the economy through tourism, are self-funded and sustainable, and do not interfere in politics.
0%
I have no problem with them, as long as they are not a burden on taxpayers and do not interfere in politics or policy.
0%
Yes, because the monarchy perpetuates inequality, embodies outdated notions of hierarchy, and views citizens as inferior.
0%
I don’t care about this issue.
Gen X 45-59 Yrs
( 0% - 0 voters )
0%
No, because they are a valuable tradition, contribute to the economy through tourism, are self-funded and sustainable, and do not interfere in politics.
0%
I have no problem with them, as long as they are not a burden on taxpayers and do not interfere in politics or policy.
0%
Yes, because the monarchy perpetuates inequality, embodies outdated notions of hierarchy, and views citizens as inferior.
0%
I don’t care about this issue.
Boomers 60-100 Yrs
( 0% - 0 voters )
0%
No, because they are a valuable tradition, contribute to the economy through tourism, are self-funded and sustainable, and do not interfere in politics.
0%
I have no problem with them, as long as they are not a burden on taxpayers and do not interfere in politics or policy.
0%
Yes, because the monarchy perpetuates inequality, embodies outdated notions of hierarchy, and views citizens as inferior.
0%
I don’t care about this issue.
Advertisement

Like truepoll India on facebook

Advertisement
() START A CONVERSATION
advertisement